| Week number | Tuesday | Thursday |
Overview of the courseIntroduction to phonetics: how speech sounds are made by humans: source/filter model; articulatory apparatus. Just a bit about acoustic phonetics. |
The sounds of English...and what we need to describe them. |
|
Sounds of French & SpanishMajor classes: vowels and consonants; sonorants, obstruents, sonority hierarchy. |
The phoneme |
|
More complex phonemic examples |
The syllableand also rule ordering. |
|
Yokuts: abstract vowels |
A case study of complex distribution: the flap in American English |
|
Complex tonal system: Bantu | English intonation |
|
| 7 February 19 & 21 | History of all of linguistics | Midterm |
| 8 February 26 & 28 |
Morphology 1 |
Blind morphological analysis |
| 9 March 4 & 6 | Morphology 2 |
ASL 1 |
| 10 March 11 & 13 | ASL 2 |
Optional class today Automatic morphological analysis |
| Week number | Assignment based on this week's work | Reading for this week. All of this is available on the Chalk site. |
| 1 | i. O'Grady et al: Exercises 2-7, 9, 10 on pp. 52ff:. |
January 3: O'Grady et al.: Pp 15-37; 42; 44-49
|
| 2 |
i. O'Grady et al: Exercises 3, 4, 5, ii. Kongo obstruents |
January 10: (Optional) Edward Sapir: (Optional) Morris Swadesh. O'Grady et al: Pp. 57-83. Appendix: Hints for solving phonology problems, pp. 99-101.On features: pp. 108-109. |
| 3 |
i. Isthmus Zapotec ii. Tonkawa |
January 17: Abigail Cohn: (Optional) Leonard Bloomfield:
|
| 4 |
i. Lamba ii. Navajo iii. Palauan
|
January 24: Kenstowicz and Kisseberth, How do Americans flap their /t/s?
|
| 5 | No assignment: study for midterm! |
January 31: Complex tonal system and English intonation Reading from Week 1, Section 8, on prosody. John Goldsmith: English as a tone language. |
| 6 Midterm week | i. Okpe vowel system: for weekend after the midterm. |
Feb. 7: Current phonological models John Goldsmith: Aims of autosegmental phonology. If you want to read more about the history of phonology, you can go to this website. |
| 7 | i. Indonesian prefixes. |
February 14: John Goldsmith and Bernard Laks: On the origins, principles, and successors to generative phonology. Andrew Spencer: Morphology. Chapter 9 in The Handbook of Linguistics, ed. by Aronoff and Rees-Miller. |
| 8 | i. Blind morphology problem, part 1 |
February 21 |
| 9 | i. Second part of blind problem. |
February 28 : ASL linguistics Wendy Sandler and Diane Lillo-Martin: Natural Sign Languages. Chapter 22 in The Handbook of Linguistics, ed. by Aronoff and Rees-Miller. |
| 10 | March 8: |
In more detail:
| Week number | |||
| 1 |
At our first meeting, I will make appropriate introductory remarks, describe the contents of the syllabus. The difference between standard orthography and phonetic transcription. Phonetic transcription has more than one goal: narrow and broad transcriptions. What is the purpose of the transcription? Phonetics; how sounds are made. Source/filter. Link to a good set of slides by Donald Finan, at the University of Colorado. Vowels versus consonants. The source-filter
model of speech production: the vocal folds produce an acoustic signal
with energy distributed over a wide range of frequency, but heavily concentrated
on a fundamental frequency and its (integral) multiples, also known as
its overtones. The fundamental frequency (F0) is the rate at which the
vocal folds open and close. This spectrum is heavily influenced by the articulatory apparatus above it, primarily the mouth. For most of the consonants, the obstruents, addition obstructions in the mouth give rise to further turbulence, a secondary source of acoustic energy. Vowels do not induce further turbulence, but they act as an echo chamber, strengthening some frequencies and weakening others; consonants do this as well, but in a less elegant and refined way. In short, all the activities of the mouth act as a filter applying to the spectrum created by the larynx. The hearer, in turn, must decode the signal into the pieces of information that gave rise to the complex phonetic signal produced by the speaker. (Source of the source-filter model: Some terms of physics for linguists, by G. Oscar Russell; Language 4(2) 1928. Organization of sounds by virtue of how they contrast: phonemic inventories and the nature of distinctions. This brings us to right to the edge of phonology, but we're not ready to go there yet.
Internet: But best of all,
I'd say: Excellent overview of phonetics and phonology by Peter Coxhead |
The sounds of English |
|
| 2 |
Sounds of French & SpanishLink for German phonetics: http://www.uni-trier.de/~mein4101/Download/ASUManual.pdf
Great link from UIowa with both Spanish and English |
The phoneme: definition of a phonemic analysis.While there is infinite variety in the speech sounds as acoustic events, a linguistic utterance is not just an acoustic event but also a symbolic event, and it expresses a sequence of symbols selected from a reasonably small inventory of more abstract sound-based units that are called phonemes. A phonemic analysis of a language is a set of phonemes (roughly 15 - 50 in number in a given language) which have both a symbolic and a phonetic side to them. As symbols, they are concatenated to form the expression of morphemes, while from a phonetic point of view, they are expressed acoustically by a range of expressions within a bounded region. The limits of the bounded regions may vary from one dialect to another. Phonology began with the recognition of this stable interior of languages' sound systems cloaked within a massive range of sound varieties. Some variation is free variation; other variation is set by the context in which the phoneme finds itself. With a knowledge of the principles determining the variation (generally language-particular, not universal), utterances and morphemes can be analyzed as sequences of phonemes. Principles of a satisfactory phonemic analysis of a language: 1. A phonemic analysis
A of a language consists of a finite set of phonemes P; each word can
be assigned a phonemic representation, which is a sequence of phonemes,
and each sequence of phonemes can be realized in one (or more) way(s)
which can be expressed by suitable explicit rules. Key notions: (1) contrast: two sounds are in contrast if there are two distinct words that differ just by the difference between those sounds (key versus tea, for example), (2) conditioned variation: a /t/ is pronounced in one way before a stressed vowel, and another way elsewhere; and (3) free variation: a certain phoneme can be realized in either of two ways with no possible lexical difference between them. (Almost the "you say potato and I say potah-to" case: but "Tate" and "tot" are distinct words in English.) Please read Phonemic analysis after this class.
|
|
| 3 |
More complex phonemic examplesExamples: 1. stop/spirants in Spanish. 2. Aspiration in Porteño Spanish. 3. French mid vowels 4. Affrication and high vowel laxing in Québécois. 5. /ay/-raising in American English. 6. Time permitting: /ae/ tensing in American English
|
The syllableCurve and constituency. Arabic word margins; English word margins. Syntax and syllables (Pike, Kuryl)
|
|
| 4 |
Yawelwani YokutsAbstract segments and rule ordering
|
FlappingA case study of complex distribution |
|
| 5 | Complex tonal systems: Bantu
|
English intonation |
|
| 6 |
The history of linguistics
|
Midterm
|
|
| 7 |
The history of phonology
|
Frequency, information theory and phonology
|
|
| 8 |
Morphology 1What is a word? What is a morpheme? Can words be broken up (down) into component pieces? Do the pieces have meanings? Allomorphy.Here are some excellent readings to be found on the Internet. Please look into them, and read around in them. Internet readings: What is a word? by Larry Trask Inflectional vs.
derivational morphology:
|
Blind morphological analysis.Doing linguistics when you don't understand what they are saying.
|
|
| 9 |
Morphology 2
|
American Sign Language 1Powerpoint presentation on ASL. Pdf
Reading assignment:
click
here. |
|
| 10 |
|
(optional class: reading period) Automatic learning of morphology.The design of software to automatically learn the morphology of a language. See Linguistica's website.
|
From Bruce Hayes' Phonetics Fonts Page (http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/120a/PhoneticFonts.htm)
Linguists often need to use phonetic fonts to depict utterances with phonetic accuracy. Several free, downloadable phonetic fonts is now available for this purpose, thanks to the Summer Institute of Linguistics.
SIL IPA 93
SIL IPA93 is a collection of True Type phonetic fonts. These are the old-fashioned kind of font, where the symbols actually replace some of the 224 ASCII symbols that normally would depict other characters. Therefore, you have to change fonts when you're word processing.
These fonts are currently used in my teaching (handouts and software), though
I hope to move beyond them sooner or later.
If you're having trouble getting these fonts to work, go to the SILIPA93 Troubleshooting Page.
Gentium
Another phonetic font is the new Gentium font, also available for free download from SIL. This is a Unicode font, so you don't have to switch back and forth between fonts when you use it in word processing--Unicode has room for about 65,000 symbols, so every symbol has its own spot in the system. Gentium in fact is not just a phonetic font; it has the regular Roman letters and supports various foreign languages, too. The appearance of the font is unusual, if elegant, and I find it a bit tricky to read on the computer screen.
This is a big font, so if you use the Insert, Symbol procedure in Word to insert your symbols, you'll have to scroll down through the various character sets until you get to IPA Extensions, which has what you want.
Doulos SIL Beta
Like Gentium, this font is Unicode, so you don't have to switch back and forth between fonts, and can also do various foreign languages with the same font. Doulos SIL matches the Times font that most people use for their word processing, which is nice if that's what you're used to. It shows up clearly on your computer screen. Lastly, unlike the old SILDoulosIPA93 fonts, it doesn't alter the spacing of lines on the page. Available for free download from the Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Doulos SIL is a big font, so if you use the Insert, Symbol procedure in Word to insert your symbols, you'll want to scroll down through the various character sets until you get to IPA Extensions, which has what you want.
Inserting the Symbols with your Word Processor
I know of two ways to do it.
One method is to use the numeric keypad; see this handout for how.
The other method assumes you have Microsoft Word, and requires you to develop a system bit by bit:
The first time you need a symbol, go to Insert, then Symbol, then find your phonetic font, then find your symbol. Click on the symbol to highlight it. Then click on the Shortcut Key button. Choose your shortcut key.
In choosing shortcut keys, I like to use a two-keystroke mnemonic system. Thus, for the IPA "snake" symbol that represents the sound of the letter sequence "sh", I use Ctr Alt Shift s, h. Similarly, the a-e digraph for the vowel of "cat" is Ctr Alt Shift a, e. But you can also use simpler keystrokes for the most common symbols, so for instance I use Ctr e for schwa.
Once you picked your shortcut key combination, click Close, twice. Now, when you type the shortcut sequence, the symbol will pop onto the screen. Gradually, you can develop a full set of shortcut keys in this way.
One more thing: when you set up shortcut keys, the next time you exit Word, you'll be asked if you want to save "normal.dot". The answer is "yes"; normal.dot contains the information about your shortcut keys.
If you set up all your symbols this way, eventually, you'll remember all the codes and be able to word-process phonetic symbols fairly fluently. I have to admit, however, that this system works best if you get a lot of opportunities to practice...