| 40% | Homework |
| 20% | Midterm (Feb. 12) |
| 15% | Paper due at the end of Week 9 (March 4) |
| 25% | Final |
| Week number | Tuesday | Thursday |
| 1 January 6 & 8 |
Overview of the courseIntroduction to phonetics: how speech sounds are made by humans: source/filter model; articulatory apparatus. Just a bit about acoustic phonetics. |
The sounds of English...and what we need to describe them.*No class today; see note above.*mp3 |
| 2 January 13 & 15 |
Sounds of French & SpanishMajor classes: vowels and consonants; sonorants, obstruents, sonority hierarchy. |
The phoneme...as pure language-specific classification of sounds.mp3 |
| 3 January 20 & 22 |
Directionality in the description of a language's sounds, and neutralization...and generative phonology. |
Rule ordering |
| 4 January 27 & 29 | Distinguishing morphophonemics and phonology. |
Discussion and more examples |
| 5 February 3 & 5 | A case study of complex distribution: the flap in American English | English intonation |
| 6 February 10 & 12 | History of all of linguistics | Midterm |
| 7 February 17 & 19 | History of phonology |
Frequency, information, and phonology |
| 8 February 24 & 26 |
Morphology 1 |
Blind morphological analysis |
| 9 March 3 & 5 | Morphology 2 |
ASL 1 |
| 10 March 10 & 12 | ASL 2 |
Optional class today Automatic morphological analysis |
| Week number | Assignment based on this week's work | Reading for this week. All of this is available on the Chalk site. |
| 1 | No homework assignment to hand in from this week's work.
|
Class 2: O'Grady et al.: Pp 15-37; 42; 44-49. There is a lot of detail in this chapter, but basically you need to know it all. A few point here and there might count as a bit obscure, but not much: this is all quite important. By the way, the Wikipedia article on the IPA is actually quite good, so read it to get a broader perspective on the material that is covered in the assigned reading above and in class. (Wikipedia articles on linguistics have not been very good, although many have improved recently due to an organized effort.)
|
| 2 |
1. O'Grady et al: Exercises 2-7, 9, 10 on pp. 52ff. 2. Read this whole assignment before you start it: Transcribe the first paragraph of "Comma gets a cure"(see just below for text) as you yourself pronounce it. Write the transcription immediately underneath the words (so the standard spelling should be triple spaced). If you can type your own transcription, that would be better, but if you can't, write neatly. Then transcribe the following recording, up to "headed for work." (that's a little over 30 seconds--don't transcribe the announcer at the beginning!): Link to London RP. Put this transcription right underneath the first transcription (i.e., so the written word, your pronunciation, and the London pronunciation are immediately stacked on top of each other, on successive lines). |
O'Grady et al: Pp. 57-83. Appendix: Hints for solving phonology problems, pp. 99-101.On features (this is really for class 5): pp. 108-109. And reread the material in last week's reading assignment that focuses on the phonemes of English. (Optional) Edward Sapir: (Optional) Morris Swadesh. |
| 3 |
1. O'Grady et al: Exercises 3, 4, 5,??? 2. Lamba 3. Navajo. This problem is tough (until you figure out the solution). The crucial thing is to formulate clear hypotheses about what the underlying forms of the two prefixes are. In addition, think outside the box with regard to the conditioning environment for the rule that changes the point of articulation of the fricatives. 4. Transcribe the two following recordings, up to "headed for work" (that is, the first paragraph). Link to Alabama speaker. Link to New York speaker. Align the two transcriptions, like you did last week. |
Classes 5 and 6: Abigail Cohn: Morris Halle: |
| 4 |
1. Tonkawa
|
(Optional:) Kenstowicz and Kisseberth, Generative Phonology: Section on
|
| 5 | No assignment: study for midterm! |
For class 9: For class 10: English intonation: Reread the section of the reading from Week 1, Section 8, on prosody, and also: |
| 6 Midterm week |
1. Tagalog. 2. Optional problem: Okpe vowel system. This is a hard problem, whose solution is very similar to that of Yokuts, which is discussed in the optional reading for Week 4. You must really understand the discussion of the Yokuts problem to get this one right. |
Class 11: Class 12: Midterm. |
| 7 | i. Indonesian prefixes. |
Class 13: John Goldsmith and
Bernard Laks: If you want to read more about the history of phonology, you can go to this website. Class 14: |
| 8 | i. Blind morphology problem, part 1 |
Class 15: Andrew Spencer: |
| 9 | i. Second part of blind problem. |
Class 18-19: Wendy Sandler and Diane Lillo-Martin: |
| 10 |
Here are some more specific -- and a bit random-- notes on particular class meetings:
At our first meeting, I will make appropriate introductory remarks, describe the contents of the syllabus.
The difference between standard orthography and phonetic transcription.
Phonetic transcription has more than one goal: narrow and broad transcriptions. What is the purpose of the transcription?
Phonetics; how sounds are made.
Vowels versus consonants.
The source-filter
model of speech production: the vocal folds produce an acoustic signal
with energy distributed over a wide range of frequency, but heavily concentrated
on a fundamental frequency and its (integral) multiples, also known as
its overtones. The fundamental frequency (F0) is the rate at which the
vocal folds open and close.
This spectrum is heavily influenced by the articulatory apparatus above it, primarily the mouth. For most of the consonants, the obstruents, addition obstructions in the mouth give rise to further turbulence, a secondary source of acoustic energy. Vowels do not induce further turbulence, but they act as an echo chamber, strengthening some frequencies and weakening others; consonants do this as well, but in a less elegant and refined way. In short, all the activities of the mouth act as a filter applying to the spectrum created by the larynx. The hearer, in turn, must decode the signal into the pieces of information that gave rise to the complex phonetic signal produced by the speaker. (Source of the source-filter model: Some terms of physics for linguists, by G. Oscar Russell; Language 4(2) 1928.
Organization of sounds by virtue of how they contrast: phonemic inventories and the nature of distinctions. This brings us to right to the edge of phonology, but we're not ready to go there yet.
Internet:
The IPA's webpage.
Paul Meier site: very nice interface for IPA
vowels, diphthongs, etc. Don't
miss this one.
George Dillon's
Spoken English
Daniel Currie Hall, a graduate student at the University of Toronto, has
developed a terrific online,
interactive mid-sagittal section. Don't miss it, and don't leave home
without one.
But best of all,
I'd say:
Peter Ladefoged, one of the premier phoneticians of the past century, had a great
webpage with lots of diagrams, symbols, and sound recordings. Spend
a lot of time here. Daniel Hall has a nice
webpage that provides links to Ladefoged's files too. You will want
to be studying these over the next several classes!
While there is infinite variety in the speech sounds as acoustic events, a linguistic utterance is not just an acoustic event but also a symbolic event, and it expresses a sequence of symbols selected from a reasonably small inventory of more abstract sound-based units that are called phonemes. A phonemic analysis of a language is a set of phonemes (roughly 15 - 50 in number in a given language) which have both a symbolic and a phonetic side to them. As symbols, they are concatenated to form the expression of morphemes, while from a phonetic point of view, they are expressed acoustically by a range of expressions within a bounded region. The limits of the bounded regions may vary from one dialect to another.
Phonology began with the recognition of this stable interior of languages' sound systems cloaked within a massive range of sound varieties. Some variation is free variation; other variation is set by the context in which the phoneme finds itself. With a knowledge of the principles determining the variation (generally language-particular, not universal), utterances and morphemes can be analyzed as sequences of phonemes.
Principles of a satisfactory phonemic analysis of a language:
1. A phonemic analysis
A of a language consists of a finite set of phonemes P; each word can
be assigned a phonemic representation, which is a sequence of phonemes,
and each sequence of phonemes can be realized in one (or more) way(s)
which can be expressed by suitable explicit rules.
2. Distinctness: Any two words are either identical in sound, in
which case, their phonemic representation is identical, or distinct, in
which case their phonemic representations must be distinct.
3. Predictability of realization: The phonetic realization of a
phoneme can be conditioned by its phonological environment (i.e., the
other sounds that occur in the utterance), but not by anything else. [Be
clear on what "anything else" might be!].
4. Minimality: There must be no alternative phonemic analysis A'
with fewer phonemes than A.
Key notions: (1) contrast: two sounds are in contrast if there are two distinct words that differ just by the difference between those sounds (key versus tea, for example), (2) conditioned variation: a /t/ is pronounced in one way before a stressed vowel, and another way elsewhere; and (3) free variation: a certain phoneme can be realized in either of two ways with no possible lexical difference between them. (Almost the "you say potato and I say potah-to" case: but "Tate" and "tot" are distinct words in English.)
Please read Phonemic analysis after this class.
From Bruce Hayes' Phonetics Fonts Page (http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/Fonts/)
Linguists often need to use phonetic fonts to depict utterances with phonetic accuracy. Several free, downloadable phonetic fonts is now available for this purpose, thanks to the Summer Institute of Linguistics.
SIL IPA 93
SIL IPA93 is a collection of True Type phonetic fonts. These are the old-fashioned kind of font, where the symbols actually replace some of the 224 ASCII symbols that normally would depict other characters. Therefore, you have to change fonts when you're word processing.
These fonts are currently used in my teaching (handouts and software), though
I hope to move beyond them sooner or later.
Gentium
Another phonetic font is the new Gentium font, also available for free download from SIL. This is a Unicode font, so you don't have to switch back and forth between fonts when you use it in word processing--Unicode has room for about 65,000 symbols, so every symbol has its own spot in the system. Gentium in fact is not just a phonetic font; it has the regular Roman letters and supports various foreign languages, too. The appearance of the font is unusual, if elegant, and I find it a bit tricky to read on the computer screen.
This is a big font, so if you use the Insert, Symbol procedure in Word to insert your symbols, you'll have to scroll down through the various character sets until you get to IPA Extensions, which has what you want.
Doulos SIL Beta
Like Gentium, this font is Unicode, so you don't have to switch back and forth between fonts, and can also do various foreign languages with the same font. Doulos SIL matches the Times font that most people use for their word processing, which is nice if that's what you're used to. It shows up clearly on your computer screen. Lastly, unlike the old SILDoulosIPA93 fonts, it doesn't alter the spacing of lines on the page. Available for free download from the Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Doulos SIL is a big font, so if you use the Insert, Symbol procedure in Word to insert your symbols, you'll want to scroll down through the various character sets until you get to IPA Extensions, which has what you want.
Inserting the Symbols with your Word Processor
I know of two ways to do it.
One method is to use the numeric keypad; see this handout for how.
The other method assumes you have Microsoft Word, and requires you to develop a system bit by bit:
The first time you need a symbol, go to Insert, then Symbol, then find your phonetic font, then find your symbol. Click on the symbol to highlight it. Then click on the Shortcut Key button. Choose your shortcut key.
In choosing shortcut keys, I like to use a two-keystroke mnemonic system. Thus, for the IPA "snake" symbol that represents the sound of the letter sequence "sh", I use Ctr Alt Shift s, h. Similarly, the a-e digraph for the vowel of "cat" is Ctr Alt Shift a, e. But you can also use simpler keystrokes for the most common symbols, so for instance I use Ctr e for schwa.
Once you picked your shortcut key combination, click Close, twice. Now, when you type the shortcut sequence, the symbol will pop onto the screen. Gradually, you can develop a full set of shortcut keys in this way.
One more thing: when you set up shortcut keys, the next time you exit Word, you'll be asked if you want to save "normal.dot". The answer is "yes"; normal.dot contains the information about your shortcut keys.
If you set up all your symbols this way, eventually, you'll remember all the codes and be able to word-process phonetic symbols fairly fluently. I have to admit, however, that this system works best if you get a lot of opportunities to practice...